LETS COMPARISON TWO SUPER STARS OF DIFFERENT ERA ,S.

IN ACTING POINT OF VIEW RAJENDRA IS FAR BETTER ACTOR THEN SHAH RUKH.HE PROVED THIS IN ARZOO ,SAATHI GEET AND ETC.

WHEN YOU COMPARE THESE TWO STARS IN TERMS OF PAPULARITY THEN SHAH RUKH WINS THE RACE.

WHEN YOU SEE THE BOXOFFICE RECORD THEN ITS DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO PICK ANY ONE.

 SHAH RUKH KHAN HAS THREE BLOCKBUSTERS.DDLJ,KARAN ARJUN,KKHH.

RAJENDRA KUMAR HAS FOUR BLOCKBASTERS IN HIS CARRIER.MOTHER INDIA ,MERE MEHBOOB,SANGAM,LOVE STORY.

SHAH RUKH KHAN HAS THREE SUPER HITS AND RAJINDER HAS TWO SUPER HITS.

YOU COULD NOT CAOMPARE THESE TWO STARS IN TERMS OF BOXOFFICE SUCCESS.BECAUSE THEY ARE EQUALLY SUCCESSFULL.

YOU COULD COMPARE THEM IN TERMS OF ACTING ABILITY.

SHAH RUKH KHAN HAS WON 6 FILMFARE AWARDS.RAJENDRA KUMAR COULD NOT WON ANY FILMFARE AWARD.IT DOES NOT SUGGEST THAT SHAH RUKH IS BETTER ACTOR THEN RAJENDRA KUMAR.

BECAUE FILMFARE HAS NOT A CRITERIA FOR AWARDS.THEY GIVE THE AWARDS UNFAIRLY.I HAVE SOME ARGUMENTS OF THERE UNJUSTICE.

IN 61 DILIP KUMAR PERFORMED THE ROLE OF HIS CARRIER IN GUNGA JUMNA BUT FILMFARE GIVE AWARD TO RAJ KAPOOR FOR JIS DESH MAIN GANGA BEHTI HAI.IT WAS A GREAT FAULT MADE BY FILMFARE.

AGAIN IN 64 THEY GAVE AWARD TO DILIP KUMAR FORFILM LEADER WHICH DO NOT SHOW THE ACTING ABILITY OF DILIP KUMAR.IN THIS YEAR FILMFARE SHOULD GIVE AWARD TO RAJ KAPOR FOT FILM SANGAM.

IN 65 FILMFARE MADE ANOTHER BIG FAULT BY GIVING AWARD TO SUNIL DUTT FOR KHANDAN.IN THIS YEAR RAJENDRA PERFORMED THE  BEST ROLE OF INDIAN CINEMA ,FILMFARE SHOUL GIVE HIM AWARDFOR CLASSIC ARZOO.

THIS LIST IS VERY LONG.

BACK ON TOPIC.

SHAH RUKH CANNOT DO TRAGEDY COMMAEDY AS WELL AS RAJENDRA COULD DO.

RAJENDRA IS MASTER OF TRAGEDY COMMEDY ROMANCE ACTION OFFBEAT AND ALL GENER S.

SHAH RUKH KHAN IS A GOOD ACTOR BUT NOT A GREAT ACTOR AT ALL.

INDIAN PUBLIC SHOULD HIGHLIGHT RAJENDRA KUMAR MORE THEN SHAH RUKH KHAN AND OTHER ACTORS. HE IS ONLY LEGEND IN BOLLYWOOD.

ALL THE READER WILL AGREE WITH ME.

reply,who is the best.

please dont say blindly shah rukh.

Rajendra Kumar couldnt do action movies nor was he a good dancer.. He never acted in negative roles.. I can go on all day..

he did superb action roles in films like,gora aur kala,shatranj,ganwaar,lalkaar.

he shows his dancing talent in songs like O SANAM TERE HO GAYE HUM AND TUM KO BHI TU,AYE MILAN KI BELA DEKHO AYE.

he did not performe negative role in a whole film.but he shows his talent in some part of the film.akele mat jayio,tangewaala,gora aur kaala.

now,you would say DEEPAK that rajendra kumar is best.

SHAHRUKH KHAN

Rajendra kumar a alltime great actor.

Rajendra is really good actor, but it makes us mad if you keep on making topics about "RAJENDRA KUMAR".

www.youtube.com

why people are making such a stupid comparision because they both are from different era,,,,if you want to compare shah rukh s' then compare with salman,amir n hrithk n even don't compare shah rukh's with amitabh coz their age different are huge

hi adnan, i think you gone mad ...go to some  carreer specialist to cure your  abnormal brain i think you need some rest .......stupid person

mind your language,mr dawa.

you could compare actors of different generations.beacause all the present actors are doing same thing,which old actors had done.present actors are doing tragedy,comedy romantic..etc.......

all the old actors had done it.so,there is no difference between them.

please open your inner eyes .poor boy.

Dawa u can just control ur madness.

I just want to see your reaction when the world is gonna say you are a stupid person...HAHA

Rajendra kumar is the best

Rajendra Kumar had good looks - he just looked good, all he had to do was look at the heroine. Shahrukh Khan is good but no good looks! He probably has squeeze his face to look romantic.

 Rajendra Kumar was a great actor because he did not laugh like a goat (SRK does) he acted more natural. Had great expressions. RK did comedy roles and SRK has not done one - probably Paheli (I liked SRK in that one).

 I can watch RK movies over and over.... also watched Paheli so many times but just love RK too much as compared to SRK. Could also be songs... and the romantic feel RK could create that not even Dilip Kumar could and Raj Kapoor was pathetic. I mean a hero of the movie should carry the movie and mesmerize audience that is the effect RK has done and still rules my heart....

I wished he was still alive....

Rajendra Kumar did a -ive role in 'Dhool Ka Phool'!

V.V.V.V Well said, Aruna.

 He was & is true Legend.

    watch his performance in songless " Kanoon".

Great Information about RK -  Adnan.

I heard he was also a nice human being. He helped the producer  financially for making Mere Mehboob and also gave Sadhna a chance to perform as a herione.

Never heard virtuos storied about SRK - I am sure he is good as well - may be a little immature...  

well i think srk

 There is a pungent tang of nostalgia in acclaiming Rajendra Kumar a better actor . Comparison is healthy when it is unbiased, else the critic becomes one-eyed dear. Rajendra Kumar was, undoubtedly, a great actor, branded as "Jubilee Star". As a tragic hero (Dil Ek Mandir, Sangam, for example) he could leave abiding impressions amongst audiences. In "romantic" manifestations, he was, of course, unparellai and unvanquished in his times. "Aarzoo", "Mere Meheboob","Pyar Ka Sagar","Sathi" and a host are there as spacimens of his romantic magnificence. But, with humble regards to this great star, one can, unhesitatingly, put Shah Rukh Khan on a loftier height in terms of versatility. His performances in negative roles in the films like "Anjam","Darr","Bazigar"are not only superb but full of  deep-delved psychological complexities. Sharukh, in the teething of his career had the guts to enact the roles of " anti-hero" so much so that no hero including Rajendra Kumar could dare to take up such challenge under the apprehension that this would prove detrimental to their established images. Sharukh, on the other, has been iconoclast or an image-breaker. His bohemianism portrayed in DDLJ made him the apple of the Nation's eye. His flexibility, frolicness, friskiness cannot be found in Rajendra Kumar. With the passage of time, body-acting has replaced facial or physionomical acting . Naturally, the present actors give great importance on the physique, which has become a part of acting, and for this they are to labour a lot . Aamir Khan, for example, gained six-pack abs for the role in "Gajini", so is the case of King Khan for "Om Shanti Om". If the roles demand to become a "Kabir Khan"(Chak de..),or Vicky (Bazigar), or Devdas Mukherjee (Devdas) Sha Rukh Khan has to translate and condition himself accordingly. Keeping apart dancing capability and fighting dynamism, if we strain nerves with portrayals of different characters, Shah Rukh Khan is a few furlongs ahead. From the T.V serial "Fauji"and "Circus" Sharukh travelled through the zig zag paths laying the milestones like "Raju Ban gaya Gentleman","Kabhi Ha Kabhi Na","Darr", "KKKG' to "Swadesh""Chak De..".As for box office both Rajendra Kumar and Shah Rukh experienced spills and thrills. The former had to bear the disasters like "Aaman","Tangewalla""Jhuk Gaya Aasman", the latter like "Duplicate","Asoke", "Kavi Alvida..." Both struggled to achieve their realms. But, the most striking advantage of the second (SRK) is that he could examine the plus-points of the first (RK) to take after them, and the shortcomings or the lacks, not let it happen with him. Rajendra Kumar was unfortunate for not being able to scrutinize Sha Rukh, while the latter has been fortunate to inspect the predecessor.

DIPEN SAID: The former had to bear the disasters like "Aaman","Tangewalla""Jhuk GayA Aasman. YOUR information is false. AMan released in 1967 and it was "ABOVE AVERAGE " at the Boxoffice... Tangewala" released in 1972.it was flop . "Jhuk Gaya Aasman" was released in 1968 and it was "Below Average. so,none of them was "Disastrous". you also said that SRK IS MORE VERSITLE. Rajendra kumar did all kind of Roles. He did comic roles in films like"Aas ka Pachchi",Do Jasoos".etc.... He did action roles in films like "Gora aur Kala",Aahuti,Mazdoor zinaabaad".etc..... He did tragic roles in films like "sangam,Dil Ek Munder,Aarzoo. he did romantic roles in films like "Aye Milan Ki Bela,. He did period kind of film when he was at the top of his popularity.Suraj was that film. He did not do any Villanous roles.Because in those times it was not trend. Dilip Kumar,Manoj Kumar,Guru Dutt, also did not do villanius roles. Pran & Ajit were their to do such roles.

 say something for legend kumar.